Time to Act.
Having looked at accelerating atmospheric CO2 in the
previous post I decided to move things along a little and consider the challenge
that humanity faces to keep warming to a minimal and the impacts of delaying
actions. Thankfully as we saw in an
earlier post COP21 is trying to address these issues. But I found two interesting papers in Nature
that looked at just such issues, Peters et al, 2013 and Allen and Stocker,
2014 both discuss such issues in their papers.
Peters et al, 2013 postulate that as emissions track
towards the high end of scenarios it is uncertain if warming will stay below
the 2°C target and that delay in mitigation will create significant problems in
attaining the 2°C target as well as raising the issue of a delay in response to
any mitigating actions allow emissions to continue to rise even after implication
of mitigating actions. Put quite simply this
means that even if we act now we may still pass our 2°C target.
Allen and Stocker, 2014 look in to the impacts in delaying
mitigation actions and discuss the rate of peak warming during mitigation
delay. They find that “peak-committed
warming is increasing at the same rate as cumulative CO2 emissions,
about 2% per year, much faster than observed warming, independent of the
climate response”, they show in their paper that delays now will require an
increased rate of reduction in the future.
Allen and Stocker, 2014, provide an illustrated figure of the emission scenarios (see below, figure 1). They echo the ethos of Peters et al, 2013, that in order to meet
the agreed target emissions must be reduced and go on to say that temperature
targets alone are insufficient, stating that stronger mitigations should be implemented
incorporating other additional climate targets.

No comments:
Post a Comment