As I
mentioned in my first post, I am new to blogging. But have decided to set myself somewhat of a
format to my posts. The reason for this is
to allow not only myself, but also anyone who is taking the time to follow me the
ability to build up a picture of the topic in hand. With this in mind, I felt it prudent to
firstly consider (if only briefly) CO2 in itself, its causes, both
natural and anthropogenic and the role it plays in our atmosphere e.g. how it
influences global temperatures.
I then
plan to move on to consider CO2 levels and global temperatures of
the past, the present and the future projections of CO2 levels and
the resulting influences on global temperatures.
I do
wonder, if as a result of this I will in time come to formulate any solid,
satisfying answers to just some of my many questions relating to anthropogenically
induced CO2 rises. For example;
do we have a moral obligation to the other life forms of the Earth to manage
the CO2 which we produce? Do
we only manage it to save humanity or to also protect ‘nature’? And, if we do it to protect ‘nature’ is this
due to its usefulness to humanity or for its own intrinsic value? If CO2 levels and global
temperatures of past climates have varied without the action of man then should
we really concern ourselves with variances as a result of our actions now?
I do
currently feel that we should hold ourselves accountable and that we should act
to mitigate anthropogenic CO2 level increases and the resulting
impacts upon the natural world. Will my
views changes as I delve deeper into the literature? Surely the ‘business as usual’ approach is no
longer viable?
![]() |
| Picture courtesy of; http://www.earthtimes.org/newsimage/co2-release-fast-environment-cope-geologists_66.jpg |

No comments:
Post a Comment